Most experts agree that the path to net-zero emissions by 2050 will be one filled with radical changes to commercial real estate, transportation, and everyday societal norms.
Can you imagine if each U.S. State capitol building was lined with solar panels? Or if the city itself was powered by solar?
Thanks to new projection tools, you can see exactly what that might look like, and how Artificial Intelligence sees it happening.
In fact, the ability to combine modern technology with historic architecture for the greater good of the environment will be one of many revolutionary changes that will need to occur in pursuit of green transformation across the U.S and the world.
Efforts To Reduce Emissions by 2050
Buildings are currently responsible for 39% of carbon emissions today (28% are from heating, cooling, and powering them), and in order to see any meaningful change, state and federal governments will likely need to set an example.
Although builders are doing this in some forms, one of the largest benefits to solar energy adoption is the Residential Clean Energy Credit and the Federal Solar Energy Systems Tax Credit.
Since 2020, $1.34 trillion has been invested by governments to support clean energy,1 which often takes the form of federal tax credit incentives such as The Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit and the Residential Clean Energy Credit. More recently, President Biden’s executive order to roll-out the Federal Sustainability Plan provides a roadmap to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50-52 percent by 2030.2
However, with carbon emissions still rising, these may not be enough. Despite today’s current efforts, greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels were projected to reach 36.8 billion metric tons in 2023 (+1.1% year over year).3
Raising awareness about the importance of sustainable energy is a great start, but isn’t enough.
And although reengineering our entire society might be too large a task to tackle in 25 years, progress is being made.
Major Policy Changes Necessary To Reach Net-Zero by 2050
Laying the groundwork for environmental transformation over the next 25 years needs to happen at the political level today.
Aligning governments across the U.S. and all over the world toward a unified stringent emissions reduction policy that requires drastic changes to architecture, transportation, and manufacturing is the only way to reach or surpass net-zero.
Green Energy Capitals: Local Government Action Can Pave the Way for Change
When thinking about the drastic changes needed to reach net-zero emissions, many people think about profitably manufacturing electric vehicles at scale. While this will be an important element, most expert agree that the current grid cannot support the high energy required for charging EVs.
So, if cities and infrastructure will need to undergo extensive changes, why not start with state capitals?
Using local government centers to model-out the process for adopting green-energy solutions across dated architecture, while also equipping cities with the necessary infrastructure to adapt to severe weather events could be the key.
Fully-implemented green energy capitals by 2050 could be the catalyst needed to reach net-zero emissions and build a sustainable future.
Here’s what they might look like.
Montgomery, Alabama


Juneau, Alaska

![]()
Phoenix, Arizona

![]()
Little Rock, Arkansas


Sacramento, California

![]()
Denver, Colorado


Hartford, Connecticut


Dover, Delaware


Tallahassee, Florida


Atlanta, Georgia


Honolulu, Hawaii

![]()
Boise, Idaho

![]()
Springfield, Illinois

![]()
Indianapolis, Indiana

![]()
Des Moines, Iowa

![]()
Topeka, Kansas

![]()
Frankfort, Kentucky

![]()
Baton Rouge, Louisiana

![]()
Augusta, Maine

![]()
Annapolis, Maryland

![]()
Boston, Massachusetts

![]()
Lansing, Michigan

![]()
Saint Paul, Minnesota

![]()
Jackson, Mississippi

![]()
Jefferson City, Missouri

![]()
Helena, Montana


Lincoln, Nebraska


Carson City, Nevada


Concord, New Hampshire


Trenton, New Jersey


Santa Fe, New Mexico


Albany, New York


Raleigh, North Carolina


Bismarck, North Dakota


Columbus, Ohio


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

![]()
Salem, Oregon

![]()
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

![]()
Providence, Rhode Island

![]()
Columbia, South Carolina

![]()
Pierre, South Dakota

![]()
Nashville, Tennessee

![]()
Austin, Texas

![]()
Salt Lake City, Utah

![]()
Montpelier, Vermont

![]()
Richmond, Virginia

![]()
Olympia, Washington

![]()
Charleston, West Virginia

![]()
Madison, Wisconsin

![]()
Cheyenne, Wyoming

![]()
References
1IEA. (2023, June). Government Energy Spending Tracker June 2023 update. IEA. Retrieved April 1, 2024, from <https://www.iea.org/reports/government-energy-spending-tracker-2>
2Office of the Federal Chief Sustainability Officer. (2024). Federal Sustainability Plan. Office of the Federal Chief Sustainability Officer. Retrieved April 1, 2024, from <https://www.sustainability.gov/federalsustainabilityplan/>
3NOAA Research. (2023, December 5). Record carbon dioxide emissions impeding progress on meeting climate goals. NOAA Research. Retrieved April 1, 2024, from <https://research.noaa.gov/2023/12/05/record-fossil-carbon-dioxide-emissions-impeding-progress-on-meeting-climate-goals-report/>
